Dion commits $70B to fix crumbling infrastructure
CTV News Video
|
ctvtoronto.ca
Date: Thursday Sep. 18, 2008 4:52 PM ET
Liberal Leader Stephane Dion used a Toronto stop to unveil a promise to spend $70 billion over the next decade on infrastructure improvements in Canada.
"Our cities and communities are facing an infrastructure deficit that is affecting Canadians' quality of life, their economic prospects and threatening our environment," he said Thursday.
Climate change could make matters worse, he said.
Experts say climate change could lead to more extreme weather events such as the 150-millimetre deluge in August 2005 that destroyed a northwest Toronto roadway and led to homes flooding because of backed-up storm sewers.
Dion accepted the infrastructure deficit estimate of the Canadian Federation of Municipalities, which pegs the number at $123 billion.
A Liberal government would be a "willing partner" in the following types of mega-projects, he said:
- An East-West energy grid
- An Atlantic energy corridor
- Carbon capture and storage pipeline between Alberta and Saskatchewan
- High-speed rail links in the densest corridors
Achieving such goals will require working together, Dion said. A federal government would contribute through a three-point plan:
- Directing unanticipated federal surpluses above $3 billion towards the infrastructure deficit.
- Raise capital by developing an infrastructure bank that would provide low-cost financing to all levels of government. The bank would be a Crown corporation. Canadians could lend money through the bank by buying green bonds.
- The gas tax transfer would be indexed to economic growth.
Dion acknowledged that U.S. Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama had already proposed a similar idea.
Jean Perrault of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities welcomed the Liberal pan.
"I will be releasing a more detailed statement about the Liberal infrastructure plan, but I can tell you now, it's good news," he told a news conference in Ottawa. "And it's a good example of the tools we need to turn the tide of the $123 billion infrastructure deficit."
Dion, who took the GO Train from Burlington to the news conference, had his GTA candidates forming a backdrop. Deputy Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff introducing him and Christine Innes, in a battle with high-profile NDP incumbent Olivia Chow in Trinity-Spadina, stood to his left.
The city sent 20 of its 23 MPs to Ottawa as Liberals in the 2006 federal election.
Ignatieff tried to contrast his party with the Conservatives' stance on infrastructure, saying that Finance Minister Jim Flaherty once said "'we don't do potholes.'"
However, Flaherty -- MP for Whitby-Oshawa and the minister responsible for Toronto -- has presided over several funding announcements in Canada's largest city, including:
- $9.7 million to provide bus transportation to York University while the subway and rapid transit extension from Downsview station is under construction.
- A permanent extension of gas tax revenues, which would put $830 million towards GTA municipalities between 2005 and 2010. Toronto would get more than $400 million of that.
The gas tax revenue was to help fix municipal infrastructure such as roads and sewers. Dion said Thursday that the gas tax transfer began under a Liberal government.
The Conservatives also announced $500 million for public transit in this year's federal budget.
Earlier this week, Mayor David Miller told reporters he wouldn't endorse any political party. He wore a "vote Toronto" button.
He did say Tuesday that so far, the Green Party was the only one to address the needs of cities so far in the federal election campaign.
"Well, so far the Green party has addressed city issues and I say, 'Good for them.' I would hope the Liberals and the NDP would do the same thing," said Miller.
On Wednesday, Green Leader Elizabeth May said she would raise the GST by one percentage point and direct the revenue to infrastructure. That would represent about $5 billion per year.
User Tools

Email
Please Add Comments( )
D - proud to be a poor Nova Scotian
0
said
0
Socialism is killing us
0
said
0
BB in B.C.
0
said
0
Craig in Calgary
0
said
0
So, Mr. Dion, too late and too expensive. Another day, another $7 billion/year.
And yes Liberal party hacks, I know that the Prime Minister announced $19 billion in spending before the election. But if you actually did some research before ranting, you'll know that those were all repeated announcements.
The money was already budgeted for in the last budget.
Jim Lad
0
said
0
I stopped listening after that.
KJ
0
said
0
BM in CGY
0
said
0
practical man
0
said
0
Buck
0
said
0
I think Dion is using the Daulton Mcguinty election playbook. Promise billions and billions of dollars in spending, promise not to raise taxes, raise taxes anyways, break almost every promise because he still can't afford it, then say he lied for own own good.
Sorry Dion, No Vote For You, Come Back, 4 Years.
David
0
said
0
John
0
said
0
Finally, a party willing to invest in the economy!
Dave in Toronto
0
said
0
Jason
0
said
0
C'mon people, this guy is promising the moon.
Gail (Hamilton)
0
said
0
Steve Daly, Mississauga
0
said
0
Is that another way of saying the problem was created by Liberals?
Dion, keep your hands out of my pockets. You've got bigger things to worry about right now like that "Iggy '09" button being worn by your 'supporter'.
Davey boy
0
said
0
Paul Vancouver Island
0
said
0
dave eagleson
0
said
0
Greg in the Hammer
0
said
0
This is madness. Yes our infrastructure needs work desperately. It also needs a well thought out plan on how this will all be financed.
Another cocktail napkin brainstorm it seems.
God help us if these beauties get into power again.
Garry is NS
0
said
0
Gender Neutral
0
said
0
nizar.mawani
0
said
0
Eva Wheatley
0
said
0
Acroyear
0
said
0
Once we get our butts handed to us on a plate on Oct. 14th, perhaps the blind sheep "leading" our party will wake the hell up and realize just how far they've strayed away from us, the party faithful.
I just pray the Reform Party (come on Conservatives, these people are no more YOUR party than the Liberals are MINE at the moment) don't get a majority so at some point we can have an election with REAL Liberals and hopefully REAL Conservatives again.
Cause right now our choices are pretty much voting for either Bozo the Liberal Green Tax Clown or Reinhard "Just call me Steve" Heydrich!
When did our country get stuck in the electoral version of The Twilight Zone?
Tired of the Fiberals
0
said
0
DRH
0
said
0
Bob
0
said
0
Sure would be nice to have a realistic group of promises made and kept.
SK in GVRD
0
said
0
I might have been born at night, but it sure wasn't last night. Give us some intellectual credit Dion.
GC
0
said
0
Marcel
0
said
0
Greg in the Hammer
0
said
0
Yes the Liberals have John McCallum an economist on hand. He's the one who has been trying to hammer away at Mr Harper and claiming that Canada needs the Liberals strong steady hand at the economic tiller of the nation. The same steady hand that OVER TAXED US TO 13 BILLION $$$$ SURPLUSES.
The same steady hand that ...away billions on the gun registry, the HRDC boondoggle, $850 million or so to cancel a navy helicopter order (the replacement to that STILL HASN'T FLOWN), stripper gate, of course the SPONSORSHIP SCANDAL (how nobody is in jail for that is beyond me), .....the list goes on.
Somewhere Pierre Elliot Trudeau is smiling. The socialists have come home to roost in the Liberal Party.
phauser
0
said
0
Why does this sound like a Monty Python sketch?
Pretty soon I can see the killer bunnies guarding the hill and attacking all those who go too near... Why doesn't someone type the lame "if you can believe him" quip when Dion makes promises he has no way of keeping while Harper gets roiled for making small measures to targeted sectors that need help?
CC-western Canada
0
said
0
Norm down east
0
said
0
IT manager in toronto
0
said
0
Marshall from Ottawa
0
said
0
Chances are it would just be taken from other initiatives that the Liberals consider to be of lesser priority.
example: DND spending.
Does that make it a good idea? Not necessarily. But it is worth pointing out that a spending increase such as this likely wouldn't come from new taxes.
The liberals are not as fiscally irresponsible as the NDP. I am sure they are fully aware that a looming recession is not the best time to be raising taxes.
As for the "green shift", well any economist would tell you that consumption taxes are perferred over an income tax. As a consumption tax has no negative impact on society's propensity to save.
The GST should never have been lowered to begin with. The decrease was made against the recommendation of the Department of Finance (who argued that personal/corporate taxes should be decreased rather than consumption tax).
sashsa
0
said
0
we were a dumb nation to have destroyed our rail structure in favour of highway transport..
for the same costs as one truck a train can move 7 times more material.. and if we switched to electric infrastructure it be something like 20 times..
plus highway transport has a devastating effect on the conditions of our highways. cost billions and billions to tax payers over and over again..
I only hope their plan is fowarding thinking like this.. and not just the same short term solution thinking of the past..